| viXra.org > Astrophysics > 2005 |
 |
 |
| viXra.org > Astrophysics > 2005 |
|
|
[26] viXra:2005.0268 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-28 07:15:41
Authors: Patrick Driessen
Comments: 156 Pages.
This essay attempts to establish a particle model based on well known experimental facts. The main hypothesis is that the universe is a fractal object, reproding homothetically on different scales, amongst which the particle scale and the galaxy scale. Models for the electron, the positron and the photon are proposed. Particles are seen as vortex structures in an aethereal fluid. They are endowed with two Killing vector: one timelike vector implies that particles are stationary structures. The second one is spacelike and indicates that the particles have axial symmetry.
Category: Astrophysics
[25] viXra:2005.0250 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-26 10:58:57
Authors: Dmitriy S. Tipikin
Comments: 7 Pages.
The way the stars in Galaxy are weighted relies heavily on the weak equivalence principle (Third Kepler Law). This law was verified in Solar System for baryonic matter – the planets and satellites rotating around the Sun. No deviations from this law was found (assuming the GR corrections). However, the Sun has a lot of non-baryonic matter inside (the photons are trapped inside for millions of years, slowly progressing toward the surface). The gravitation properties of such non-baryonic matter were never carefully investigated: unfortunately the Sun is not a binary star and gravitational attraction of two stars in the solar system was never checked. Observations of visual binaries may help to check the validity of the third Kepler law for stars motion. Re-analysis of the old data (1972) on binaries gives a hint that the slope of the mass-luminosity relation (the best way to measure the distant star) depends upon the choice of stars. This unusual observation may hint onto the violation of third Kepler Law for stars dynamic. If confirmed on large databases, this observation may resolve the dark matter problems: the stars are heavier than expected and gravitationally much heavier than expected and it may lead to re-evaluation of the mass of galaxies and as a consequence to elimination of the dark matter hypothesis for galaxies rotation.
Category: Astrophysics
[24] viXra:2005.0247 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-25 19:23:59
Authors: Wen-Xiang Chen
Comments: 5 Pages.
Penrose's intense cosmic censorship conjecture asserts that the Cauchy horizon inside the dynamically formed black hole is unstable to the remaining material eld that falls into the black hole. The physical importance of this conjecture stems from the fact that it provides the necessary conditions for general relativity to become truly deterministic gravity. In a recent paper by Hod, it provides a proof based on Beckenstein 's second law of generalized thermodynamics that conrms the validity of the interesting Penrose conjecture in the space-time of curved black holes. Recently, an article of mine obtained interesting results about the superradiant stability of Kerr black holes. The result contains some conclusions that violate the "no-hair theorem". We know that the phenomenon of black hole superradiation is a process of entropy reduction, and connecting Hod's paper with my paper, I found that the strong cosmic censorship conjecture may be violated.
Category: Astrophysics
[23] viXra:2005.0242 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-24 13:19:44
Authors: Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski
Comments: 2 Pages.
In astronomy, carbon stars are stars which have more carbon than oxygen in their atmospheres. This is measured in spectroscopic surveys. It is also inadequate for 21st century astrophysics. It is more fitting to remove the designation of “carbon star” as being some specific type of star, and to understand that carbon increases in abundance as the star evolves, as measured against helium.
Category: Astrophysics
[22] viXra:2005.0240 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-24 21:10:29
Authors: Swagatam Sen
Comments: 4 pages, English, Creative Commons Copyright
Fundamentally for the extended disc region of a spiral galaxy, an alternative solution to Laplace equation has been presented for a potential that is radially symmetric on the disc plane. This potential, unlike newtonian one, is shown to be logarithmic in distance from the centre, which allows for the rotation velocity to be constant along the disc radius.
It is also shown that this potential easily manifests into a relationship between inner mass of the galaxy and terminal rotation velocity, which has been empirically observed and known as Baryonic Tully-Fisher relations.
Category: Astrophysics
[21] viXra:2005.0181 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-27 18:10:28
Authors: Pardis Tabaee Damavandi
Comments: 6 Pages.
The wavelengths (microns) of amino acid NT Glycine are accurately reported to facilitate its recognition in interstellar mediums by IR telescopes in the course of night surveys.
Category: Astrophysics
[20] viXra:2005.0128 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-11 16:00:14
Authors: Alexander Z. Yan, Max Gaofei Yan
Comments: 4 Pages.
Recent studies showed that gamma-rays and dark matter density correlate. There is a suggestion that this is because a dark matter particle decays and emits gamma-rays. Based on a new theory of gravity and its equations relating gravity force and photon frequency, we offer a novel explanation for this observation. The new equations show that a higher frequency photon will produce a greater gravitational effect. This makes gamma-rays, the highest frequency EM wave, the strongest producer of dark matter’s gravitational effects. The search for specific frequencies, such as gamma-rays and x-rays, emitted from the decay of a hypothetical dark matter particle is flawed and contradicts observations. If dark matter’s gravitational effects are created by photons, not a particle with rest mass, dark matter observations are satisfied.
Category: Astrophysics
[19] viXra:2005.0124 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-11 01:25:23
Authors: Somnath Chakraborty
Comments: 3 Pages.
One can find gravitational lensing in all nine images at the same location. The location is marked as red dot on the screenshot. One can find the time evolution of lensed object. The time evolution gives a unknown phenomena of the lensed object. Actually the phenomena is unknown to me.These images are taken by me on the sky of purba burdwan in between 6:40 p.m to 7:10 p.m on 09/05/2020. One can contact with me for any questions(somnathphy@gmail.com). The pictures were taken at north sky near to Ursha major star cluster
Category: Astrophysics
[18] viXra:2005.0106 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-09 05:45:17
Authors: Eran Sinbar
Comments: 7 Pages.
Hawking radiation is the black hole radiation due to quantum effects near the black hole event horizon in empty space (vacuum). It is actually the evaporation process of the black hole since it generates and radiates a real particle out of empty space and losses the same energy back into the empty space. This paper tries to analyze what will happen if the black hole will be located in a space filled with energy, dominated by highly energetic Gamma ray photons. This paper suggests that the Hawking radiation due to quantum effects near the black hole event horizon in a space dominated by highly energetic photonic radiation will cause the extreme expansion of space and can explain the inflation phase of the Big Bang.
Category: Astrophysics
[17] viXra:2005.0098 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-08 07:48:53
Authors: Walter Scott McGill IV
Comments: 2 Pages.
Standing Wave Gravitational Theory
By: Walter Scott McGill IV
The phenomenon which encourages the planets to rotate around the sun is the same as acoustic levitation with standing waves. This give the planets clear swim lanes to stay in as they rotate around the sun. I believe it to be sound waves traveling through plasma and resonating back, creating Nodes which the planets reside, regardless if its sound waves or not, planets are in there positions because of standing waves within the termination shock.
Category: Astrophysics
[16] viXra:2005.0097 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-08 07:49:42
Authors: Walter Scott McGill IV
Comments: 10 Pages.
Surface Tension Gravitational Theory Version 2
By: Walter Scott McGill IV
Gravity is an object that has greater mass than the ambient particles and waves surrounding it where the force of gravity is only realized once the resistance force is created against the surface tension of a substance of greater mass or greater tension of which can’t be penetrated. The resultant force can be calculated using the Gravitational Equation with Gravitational Constant Adjusted to 6.67e-15
Category: Astrophysics
[15] viXra:2005.0091 [pdf] replaced on 2020-05-12 11:01:55
Authors: Cameron Wong
Comments: 17 Pages.
The Ives-Stilwell Experiment plays no role validating special relativity, which, being self-refuted, cannot be validated by anything. To the contrary, the experiment with the equation it concludes reveals its high potential serving as an evidence witnessing the existence of Aether, a medium that light must rely on for propagation. The next article from this author would reveal the third evidence of Aether, without which the process of energy and momentum exchange between light and electrons cannot have any proper way to explain. The current popular explanation is plainly in violation of the most fundamental principle in basic mechanics. The first evidence of Aether is portrayed by Newton's gravitational law and the article on that has been published in this General Science Journal some months ago.
Category: Astrophysics
[14] viXra:2005.0090 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-06 20:23:25
Authors: Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski
Comments: 2 Pages.
To make sure astrophysics remains coherent and consistent, I correct the assumption of astrophysicists in their claim that mass can be transferred between stars. As well, I answer the question, “can planets survive stellar evolution”. The answers and reasoning are straight forward, observed and explained using stellar metamorphosis and observations used well into the year 2020.
Category: Astrophysics
[13] viXra:2005.0083 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-07 11:01:08
Authors: A. M. Eigenson, I. B. Bazylevych
Comments: 1 Page.
PROGNOSIS OF EARTHQUAKES AND VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS ON DAILY INDEXES OF SOLAR ACTIVITY FOR MAY 2020
Category: Astrophysics
[12] viXra:2005.0079 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-05 23:05:06
Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous
Comments: 18 Pages.
This (hard) question we still try to answer with the discussion in the previous papers
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
The Moon Creation And Motion ( V)
The Moon Creation And Motion (VI)
The paper provides a clear question let's consider it for a while
-The moon data shows that, the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations- We have seen many proves for this fact in that papers
-So –Why AND How? Should be the questions
-Why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations? Because The Earth moon mass is created relative to Jupiter Mass! This proportionality between Jupiter Mass and the Earth Moon Mass causes the geometrical calculations! Such answer can be acceptable?!
-(First) Why does Jupiter Mass define the Earth Moon Mass?! and (Second) Why the proportionality between Jupiter and Earth Moon Masses causes the geometrical calculations?!
-Jupiter defines the Earth Moon mass because Jupiter is the inner planets Parent – means – Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and the Earth moon isn't different from the other inner planets! This is my answer! How to prove?
-Why does the proportionality between Jupiter mass and the Earth Moon mass produce geometrical calculations?
-Spite the idea is hard – it's clear in this abstract perfectly – So we need to move logically with it inside the paper step by step – (1st step) I provide data proves that the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculation (2nd step) we will review the answer of the question why does Jupiter define the Earth Moon mass (this question we have answered in that papers) – (3rd step) we will try to understand why the proportionality between Jupiter and the moon masses can produce any geometrical calculations or rules (and this is the new part of discussion)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Category: Astrophysics
[11] viXra:2005.0071 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-06 10:52:51
Authors: Frank H. Makinson
Comments: 8 Pages.
The association between Euclidean geometry and the electromagnetic wave phenomena was identified in 2001. A paper identifying the issue was published in a peer reviewed international publication in 2011. The title did not identify the content was directly related to Euclidean geometry, but the content did. The published title described what was accomplished, directly linking mathematical constants to a physical constant.A very serious issue involving the paper has been identified recently and it effects a vast number of other scientific publications and the theories they promote
Category: Astrophysics
[10] viXra:2005.0063 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-05 00:00:08
Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous
Comments: 14 Pages.
We complete our discussion in the previous papers
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
The Moon Creation And Motion (V)
Let's remember the last conclusions and left questions for which we write this paper
-Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) and through its Motion – Mars had collided with Venus and Earth – and from these collisions debris the Earth moon was created – Then we have faced (1st) Question – Why the Earth Moon Diameter is seen as a value created based on geometrical calculation and not by any random process – if the moon created from the collisions debris how to create its diameter based on specific geometrical calculations
-(1st Answer) was- because Jupiter defined The Earth moon mass based on geometrical calculations and the density is defined by the 3 planets densities (Mars- Venus – Earth) – So the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations! (2nd Question) was – Why Jupiter defined The Earth Moon Mass?
-(2nd Answer) was – because Jupiter is the inner planets energy source – means – Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and because of that Jupiter defined the Earth Moon mass (3rd Question) – So- Why Jupiter Mass /Earth mass =318 – what's necessary for this rate?
-(3rd Answer) was – because 318 expresses the Relationship between Earth and Pluto! And Pluto is the important word here – because the solar system main energy is found in the distance between Jupiter and Pluto – (4th Question) – Have Earth & Pluto any effect on the solar system general energy?
(Question No. 4) is the reason why we write this new paper-
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Category: Astrophysics
[9] viXra:2005.0062 [pdf] replaced on 2020-11-09 10:19:45
Authors: Fumitaka Inuyama
Comments: 11 Pages.
The beautiful Titius-Bode law about Solar planetary orbits discovered in 1766, is considered that it is a mathematical coincidence rather than an "exact" law, because it has not yet been physically proved. However, if we consider the disturbance restoration and the stability of the asteroid belt orbit and Saturn’s rings, there must be some underlying logical necessity.
Planetary orbits are often computed by Newtonian mechanics with the kinetic energy and the universal gravitation energy. Nevertheless, applying the principle of energy-minimum to the Newtonian mechanics leads to the result that the stable orbital radius is only one value, which is totally incompatible with actual phenomena. This discrepancy must result from the shortage of elements which rule over the planetary orbits. Other elements to rule over the planetary orbits are the electric charge energy and the rotation energy, both of which are guided by the Kerr-Newman solution (discovered in 1965) of the general relativity theory (discovered in 1915). Here, I mathematically demonstrated the Titius-Bode law, and also calculated the number of Saturn’s rings, maximum 31 for the first time by applying the principle of energy-minimum to the complicated energy equation which adopts mass, electric charge and rotation elements of the central core star and solving the sole differential equation.
Category: Astrophysics
[8] viXra:2005.0054 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-04 18:34:23
Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous
Comments: 17 Pages.
Abstract
We complete our discussion in previous paper
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
Let's summarize that paper conclusion here
-Mars original orbital distance was (84 mkm) and Mars had migrated from it to its new orbital distance (227.9mkm). Though Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9mkm) Mars had collided with Venus at first and Earth at second – and from these collisions debris the Moon is Created (we discuss the Earth moon creation – and I refer to no any other moon in the paper)
-So the moon is created from these collisions debris ….but
-As we have argued in that paper – The Moon Diameter is created based on some geometrical calculations and not by any random process – how the moon which is created from the collisions debris can have a diameter created based on geometrical calculation?!
-That paper solved this question and told that – the moon basic property its mass (as Newton told us) and because the moon mass was created relative to Jupiter mass – based on specific geometrical rules that enable the moon to have a diameter defined geometrically….
-The idea here is clear – because the moon density should be forced because the moon is created from the 3 planets rocks (Mars- Venus – Earth) and that create specific obligatory density and if the moon mass is created relative to Jupiter mass based geometrical rules (as we have discussed deeply in that paper) – so the moon diameter must be an obligatory value (3475 km) and this value is created based on geometrical rules because Jupiter /Moon Masses rate is defined based on geometrical rules….
-Then the next question was …. Why Jupiter should define the Moon mass? If it's the Earth Moon why its mass is defined by Jupiter?!
-For this question we had 2 answers – First because of Jupiter effect on the inner planets – And I claimed that the inner planets are created by Jupiter Energy! and the second reason was the basic reason behind the geometrical definition of Jupiter mass relative to the Earth Moon mass – please review this reason in that paper because it has a wide details…
But
-The argument can't be finished here – because we have at least 2 more basic questions let's write them in following…
-First Question Is …. Why the Earth mass is not seen in any of the moon data? If it's the Earth Moon and it's created by the Earth attraction for the collisions debris why the Earth mass can't be seen in any of the moon data?!!
-Second Question Is …..now I have claimed that Jupiter created the inner planets orbital circumference… So …. Why Earth mass should be 5.97 x 1024 kg?
i.e. Why Jupiter / Earth Masses rate should be =318?
If we could explain Why Jupiter /Moon masses rate =25920 based on the geometrical rules?! May be there are also more geometrical reasons to create Earth mass with a rate 318 relative to Jupiter Mass
Shortly…
The question was why the Earth moon mass is defined relative to Jupiter? And the answer was …. Not just the moon mass but all the inner planets masses are created relative to Jupiter! All inner planets data are created relative to Jupiter – just the Earth Moon is created after the inner planets were created and because of that we can see clearly that its mass is defined based on Jupiter mass! But the moon is just similar to any other inner planet …. That the answer … and so the next question should be … prove this idea…. For example the rate between Jupiter and Earth masses is 318 – So the question had the Earth mass to be with this rate 318? i.e. had Earth any more options to choose any other value for its mass? The answer is NO Why? because Jupiter created all the inner planets data and Earth had to followed Jupiter instructions….!
This paper will be a typical as the previous one – in the paper introduction – again we review Mars Migration Theory (sorry for repeat) but all arguments try to prove this theory and I have to provide it before each discussion – I use the planets data to prove that Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new one (227.9 mkm) and because we analyze different data I have to provide the theory to be as reference….
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Category: Astrophysics
[7] viXra:2005.0045 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-03 16:50:15
Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous
Comments: 15 Pages.
Paper Question
-How The Earth Moon Is Created?
-The Giant –Impact Hypothesis provides a good description about How the Earth Moon was Created…
-I have suggested Mars Migration Theory which can solve many difficulties faces The Giant- Impact Theory and provides a very good answer for the question how the Moon was created?
-Mars Migration Theory is reviewed in this paper introduction
Now
-Mars Migration Theory tells that – the Earth Moon was created by Mars Collisions With Venus & Earth and from these Collisions debris the Earth Moon was created in addition to Mars moons and the Asteroid belt
But
-If the Earth Moon is created from the collisions debris – why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical rules?! How to do that?
Let's consider this question in more details… for example
-The earth Moon diameter x the sun diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference – Why? this data is one of similar hundreds – for example – the moon diameter x the moon orbital motion distance (from perigee to apogee 43000 km) = Earth orbital distance…!
I want to say… that
-The Earth Moon Diameter was not created by any random process - Some Geometrical Power is found behind and forced the moon to have this (Specific Diameter & Circumference) which will be in harmony with all planets data as we have seen…!
-What's this Geometrical Power? Is it the gravity force? can the gravity produce a complex geometrical effect? What Mass the Earth should have to produce its moon with another diameter? Based on what equation?
Let's to consider this question as deep as possible in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Category: Astrophysics
[6] viXra:2005.0039 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-03 10:16:41
Authors: A. I. Andreus
Comments: 6 Pages, in Russian and English of Google, of Bing
The meta-galaxy is mixed up with the universe, and the universe is mixed up with MetaGalactica.
ANATOLIJ ANDREUS
The meta-galaxy is mixed up with the universe, and the universe is mixed up with MetaGalactica. Let's lay these two concepts in development, in the representation of the contemplation of the sky above our heads and within us the law on the development of the permanent, world of the cognizable, proceed from the postulate about the universe - the universe is eternal, infinite, homogeneous, isotropic.
Category: Astrophysics
[5] viXra:2005.0033 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-02 13:49:50
Authors: Gerges Francis Tawdrous
Comments: 28 Pages.
The paper tries to answer the following question
-Why the sun was created?
Category: Astrophysics
[4] viXra:2005.0028 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-01 20:31:00
Authors: Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski
Comments: 3 Pages.
The slope of D/H ratio given Earth’s age of 4.5 billion years, and a D/H ratio via VSMOW of 1D/6250H is 2.8125*10^13. All you have to do to determine the age of an evolved or evolving star is to take the slope and multiply that against the D/H ratio to get the age of the star. It is a linear relation and very useful.
Category: Astrophysics
[3] viXra:2005.0021 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-01 10:28:48
Authors: George Rajna
Comments: 62 Pages.
Besides looking for axions, the technique may also improve precision measurements of ultracold collision physics and studies of quantum correlations in BECs. [36]
A research team led by physicists at the University of California, Riverside, reports tiny satellite galaxies of the Milky Way can be used to test fundamental properties of "dark matter"—nonluminous material thought to constitute 85% of matter in the universe. [35]
Now that they've identified the Higgs boson, scientists at the Large Hadron Collider have set their sights on an even more elusive target. [34]
Category: Astrophysics
[2] viXra:2005.0015 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-01 02:24:40
Authors: Fumitaka Inuyama
Comments: 9 Pages.
Based on the demonstration of the Titius–Bode law for the solar system, existence and the array of the planetary system with counter rotation direction against the fixed star analyzed theoretically.
The Titius-Bode law discovered 250 years ago (in 1766), is considered to be a mathematical coincidence rather than an "exact" law, because it has not yet been physically proved.
Planetary orbits are often computed by Newtonian mechanics with the kinetic energy and the universal gravitation energy. However, applying the principle of energy-minimum to the Newtonian mechanics leads to the result that the stable orbital radius is only one value, which is totally incompatible with actual phenomena. This discrepancy must result from the shortage of elements which rule over the planetary orbits. Other elements to rule over them are the electric charge energy and the rotation energy, both of which are guided by the Kerr-Newman solution (discovered in 1965) of the general relativity theory (discovered in 1915). Here, I mathematically demonstrated the Titius-Bode law and also the array of the planetary system with counter direction against the fixed star.
Category: Astrophysics
[1] viXra:2005.0012 [pdf] submitted on 2020-05-01 03:44:40
Authors: George Rajna
Comments: 21 Pages.
If this signature occurs in the gravitational waves that we will receive from future neutron-star mergers, we would have a clear evidence for the creation of quark-gluon plasma in the present universe." [20] The improvement will see the twin observatories-located near Hanford, Washington and Livingston, Louisiana in the US-double their sensitivity to gravitational waves. [19] A group of scientists from the Niels Bohr Institute (NBI) at the University of Copenhagen will soon start developing a new line of technical equipment in order to dramatically improve gravitational wave detectors. [18] A global team of scientists, including two University of Mississippi physicists, has found that the same instruments used in the historic discovery of gravitational waves caused by colliding black holes could help unlock the secrets of dark matter, a mysterious and as-yet-unobserved component of the universe. [17] The lack of so-called "dark photons" in electron-positron collision data rules out scenarios in which these hypothetical particles explain the muon's magnetic moment. [16] By reproducing the complexity of the cosmos through unprecedented simulations, a new study highlights the importance of the possible behaviour of very high-energy photons. In their journey through intergalactic magnetic fields, such photons could be transformed into axions and thus avoid being absorbed. [15] Scientists have detected a mysterious X-ray signal that could be caused by dark matter streaming out of our Sun's core. Hidden photons are predicted in some extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics, and unlike WIMPs they would interact electromagnetically with normal matter. In particle physics and astrophysics, weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs, are among the leading hypothetical particle physics candidates for dark matter. The gravitational force attracting the matter, causing concentration of the matter in a small space and leaving much space with low matter concentration: dark matter and energy. There is an asymmetry between the mass of the electric charges, for example proton and electron, can understood by the asymmetrical Planck Distribution Law. This temperature dependent energy distribution is asymmetric around the maximum intensity, where the annihilation of matter and antimatter is a high probability event. The asymmetric sides are creating different frequencies of electromagnetic radiations being in the same intensity level and compensating each other. One of these compensating ratios is the electron-proton mass ratio. The lower energy side has no compensating intensity level, it is the dark energy and the corresponding matter is the dark matter.
Category: Astrophysics
| Third-Party Links: |
|