 |
 |
[4] viXra:2304.0124 [pdf] submitted on 2023-04-19 01:16:59
Authors: Francis M. Sanchez
Comments: 15 Pages.
Crucial developments in physics, checkable by everyone, have been missed, excluding the Universe expansion and the initial Big Bang model, and restablishing the cosmological steady-state model. The single electron cosmology gives a close estimation of the Hubble length, meaning the matter is in fact a matter-antimatter oscillation in a Permanent Bang cosmology, where dark matter would be out of phase oscillation. The nuclear fusion cosmic model gives the background temperature 2.73 Kelvin, validating the Hoyle's prediction of permanent neutron creation, an ultimate limit of physics. The Diophantine treatment of the Kepler laws induces the Space-Time quantification in a Total Quantum Physics, pushing back the Planck wall by a factor 10^{61}, possibly resolving the vacuum energy dilemma. The three-body gravitational hydrogen model explains the Tachyonic Three Minutes Formula giving half the Hubble radius, thus its critical mass, showing the Universe is a Particle in the Cosmos, whose radius would be deduced from holographic Space-Time Quantification. The Kotov Doppler-free oscillation rehabilitates the tachyonic physics of the bosonic string theory in the Octonion Topological Axis prolonging the Quaternion Periodic Table, implying the string-spin identification and gives the gravitational constant G, compatible with the BIPM measurements but 2 10^{-4} larger than the official value.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[3] viXra:2304.0099 [pdf] replaced on 2024-01-30 03:27:20
Authors: G. Malczewski, D. Selig
Comments: 47 Pages. Additional minor mathematical typos were corrected.
This work delves into three papers that address the topic of light being deflected by gravitating bodies, or alternately, light following geodesic paths through space-time. Einstein achieved public notoriety for his successful prediction that light would be deflected when passing close to the Sun, with his theory of General Relativity providing the foundation for an accurate estimate of the angle of deflection. However, 200 years prior to this Newton also predicted that light would be deflected by massive bodies such as our Sun. Newton did not attempt a calculation, but subsequently Johann Soldner and Henry Cavendish used Newtonian principles to study the degree of deflection.In this paper we explore the three efforts, providing readers with a consolidated view of this topic, and a comprehensive analysis of the calculations that support the various approaches to estimating the deflection of a photon in the vicinity of a massive body. While it is clear that General Relativity provides the most accurate, and the overwhelmingly accepted solution, we provide details for the Newtonian efforts for historical perspective. We focus on Soldner and Cavendish first for this historic perspective, and then delve into the complexities of the Einstein General Relativity calculation.We envision the target audience for this paper as undergraduate/early graduate students in math, physics, or astronomy, who have an interest in exploring the topic of light deflection. We also view this as a course outline for a professor that would like to offer a seminar on this topic.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[2] viXra:2304.0048 [pdf] replaced on 2023-04-29 00:20:02
Authors: Felix M. Lev
Comments: 157 Pages. Revised version
...The concept of infinitesimals was proposed by Newton and Leibniz. In those days, people knew nothing about elementary particles and atoms and thought that, in principle, any substance can be divided into any number of parts. But now it is clear that as soon as we reach the level of elementary particles, further division is impossible. After all, even the very name ''elementary particle'' says that such a particle has no parts, that is, it cannot be divided into 2, 3, etc. So, there are no infinitesimals in nature, and the usual division is not universal: it makes sense only up to some limit.Would it seem obvious? And then it is clear that fundamental quantum physics must be built without infinitesimals. It would seem that everyone understands that the construction of such a physics is far from being an easy task, and attempts at such a construction should be encouraged. However, my stories, described below, show that, as a rule, the establishment not only does not encourage such attempts, but does everything to ensure that the results in this direction are not published.In addition to the infinitesimal problem, I describe other problems in which I proposed new approaches, but since they are not in the spirit of what the establishment does, I had big problems with the publication. But, of all these tasks, there is one that probably overshadows all the others. This is a dark energy problem.In all my works on this problem I explain that there are no problems with explaining the cosmological acceleration and therefore dark energy and quintessence are nonsense. It would seem that if the establishment is honest, then they should at least read [1] and directly say that I do not understand something or they. But they pretend that they do not notice my publications on this topic.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
[1] viXra:2304.0009 [pdf] submitted on 2023-04-01 22:15:55
Authors: Henry H. Lindner
Comments: 47 Pages.
Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are not what physicists think they are. They are not physical theories; they are mathematical models of the observers’ experiences and measurements—of the contents of consciousness. They relate physical phenomena to observers and arbitrary frames, not to Cosmic entities or frames. Since they do not model the Cosmos, they cannot be used to theorize about Cosmic entities or processes; attempting to do so produces paradoxes and confusion. These subjectivistic models and the Science of which they are archetypes are products of Berkeleyan subjective idealism and Machian positivism—archaic spiritualistic-idealistic theories of the nature of consciousness and its contents. In order to understand the Cosmos we must relate all physical phenomena to the causal substrate—to Cosmic space. When we do so, gravity immediately appears to be the flow of inertial-electromagnetic space into all matter. The flow’s acceleration (GM/r^2) produces gravity’s ballistic effects and its velocity (√(2GM/r)) produces gravity’s electromagnetic ("relativistic") effects. This theory directly implies plausible mechanisms for black holes and for the galaxial rotation and recession anomalies (a.k.a. "dark matter" and "dark energy"). Its quantized space allows us to theorize about the microcosmic entities and processes that underlie the hierarchical evolution of complexity. Space theory restores the Cosmos and causality to both physics and philosophy.
Category: History and Philosophy of Physics
| Third-Party Links: |
|